|
PURPOSE:
This study was part of an EPA grant
to Cohasset High Schools Summer Institute Program to
assist the Gulf Association with its water quality monitoring
program. The Gulf Association members expressed concern about
the fecal coliform level in the Gulf River. Therefore, students
at CSCR conducted water quality tests monitoring the fecal
coliform levels in the Gulf River.
INTRODUCTION:
Fecal coliform are bacteria found in the feces of warm-blooded
animals and humans. The bacteria can enter bodies of water
from discharged sewage, storm runoff, and directly from mammals
and birds. By themselves, fecal coliform bacteria arent
harmful. However, it is an indicator of pathogenic organisms
present in the water. In high fecal coliform counts (over
200 colonies per 100 ml of water) the chance that pathogenic
organisms are present is greater. Pathogenic organisms include
bacteria, viruses, and parasites that cause disease. Pathogenic
organisms may infect individuals who swim in waters with high
fecal coliform counts.
For recreational waters such as the Gulf River, the Massachusetts
Surface Water Quality Standard for Bacteria states that fecal
coliform counts must be less than or equal to 200 colonies
/100 ml. This "magic number" of 200 colonies per
100 ml of sample water is determined by calculated the geometric
mean of a representative set of samples taken over a period
of 30 days. Four or five samples within this 30-day period
constitute a representative sample. Recreational waters that
meet this standard are healthy waters for primary (swimming)
and secondary (fishing and boating) recreation. (Mitchell
and Stapp, 25). Due to this statement, a group of students
at CSCR conducted a water quality test to check the safety
of the Gulf River.
MATERIALS FOR FIELD WORK:
- Sterile sample containers
- Thermometer
- GPS (Global Positioning System)
- Cooler
- Ice packs
- Pipette
- Refractometer
- Distilled water
- Felt tip marker
- Paper towel
FIELD PROCEDURE:
- Once the site of sampling is reached, label the container
with the site and date.
- Fully submerge the container at least six inches.
- Open the container (still submerged) and wait until it
is completely filled. Be sure not to take it out of the
water until the cap is tightly screwed back on. It is imperative
that the sample is in no contact with the air.
- Place the sample in a cooler and surround it with ice
packs until testing. Samples should be maintained at 4 degrees
Celsius.
- Take the temperature at the site.
- Note the tide.
- Make observations of the weather over the past day or
so.
- To take a salinity reading, place a drop of distilled
water on the Refractometer. If it is calibrated the instrument
should read zero. If it isnt calibrated take a screwdriver
and slightly turn the knob at the top of the device until
it reads zero. Once calibrated, place a drop of sample water
on the lens of the refractometer and record salinity. Find
the coordinates of longitude and latitude of the sight using
the GPS. Record latitude and longitude.
LAB MATERIALS:
- Fisherbrand FinnPippette
- Millipore Filtration System
- Filter beaker
- Stopper
- Filter paper
- Clamps
- Precision Scientific Incubator bath
- Tweezers
- Isopropyl alcohol
- Nutrient Broth
- Matches
- Distilled Water
LAB PROCEDURE:
- Before running the filtration system, place a piece of
filter paper on the stopper. Be sure the plastic on each
side is peeled off without being touched with anything but
sterile tweezers. You can quickly sterilize the tweezers
by dipping them in isopropyl alcohol and putting them in
the flame of a match.
- Next, clamp together the filter beaker on top of the stopper.
- Then pour 100ml of sample water into it and run the system.
After all the water has gone through flush some distilled
water through the system.
- After that you should do a dilution. Take the FinnPippette
(model #J64136) and set it to 10ml. Insert a new cartridge
into the device and fill it with water. Pour it into the
filtration system. This is 10ml of water so add 90Ml of
distilled water into the filtration system and turn it on.
- Put one tube of nutrient broth into each petri dish.
- Using sterilized tweezers, carefully take off the filter
paper, making sure to not let anything touch it. Place the
filter paper into each dish. For each sample put its dilution
and regular filter paper into separate petri dishes.
- When all samples have been run through the filtration
system double bag all of them and place them in the incubator.
- The water in the incubator should be heated to 44.5 degrees
Celsius. Leave the samples there for 24 hours.
- Clean up the lab, including anything that needs to be
sterilized. Put glassware into the autoclave and turn it
on.
- Return to the lab within 23-26 hours to take the samples
out of the incubator for examination.
- When a dish is opened there should be tiny blue dots present
on the filter paper. These are bacteria colonies. Count
the colonies on each dish and record the data.
ANALYSIS:
The main trend of the data seems to indicate that when
the salinity values fall below 25 parts per thousand (ppt),
then the fecal coliform counts are elevated. When salinity
values are 25 ppt or higher, the fecal coliform counts tend
to fall between 50-150 colonies, which is within the acceptable
range for swimming. (The standard in Massachusetts for
recreational waters is below 200 colonies for every 100 ml).
Our results seem to indicate that the tide is one
variable related to changes in fecal coliform counts. The
counts closest to the bridge (Shockman) at the mouth of the
river have lower counts than Gannet Mushquashcut and Gannet
Canoe that are farther up the river. However, to confirm these
results, more testing will be required.
Chart 1: Shockman:
(view chart)
The geometric mean of samples taken at the Shockman site was
69.17. This suggests that fecal coliform contamination is
not a problem at this end of the Gulf River. There was only
one count that was noted as TNTC, or too numerous to count.
This sampling event was assigned the value of 201. Most of
the counts under 200 seemed to have a salinity value of around
32 ppt, suggesting that ocean influences are significant at
this site.
Chart 2: Hartshorne:
(view chart)
The geometric mean of samples taken at the Hartshorne site
was 80.60. Two times the counts were zero; only one time did
we find a TNTC result. Similar to the Shockman site, the counts
that were below 200 had a salinity value of around 30, again
suggesting that tidal influences are strong at this section
of the river.
Chart 3: Malley:
(view chart)
The geometric mean of samples taken at the Malley site was
152.69. There were three times that the count was too numerous
to count and two additional counts of 194 and 247. Although
reasons why counts might be elevated at this site are still
unknown to us at this time, we have noticed that the geometric
mean of counts tends to be higher as one moves further away
from the harbor.
Chart 4: Gannet Mushquashicut:
(view chart)
The geometric mean of samples taken at the Musquashicut site
was 138.98. There were four times that the count was too numerous
too count. These TNTC results, however, were significantly
higher than 200 while the salinity was much lower on those
days suggesting that fresh water sources were more influential
at this site.
Chart 5: Gannet Canoe:
(view chart)
The geometric mean of samples taken at the Canoe Club site
was 205.36. This exceeds the Massachusetts standard for safe
use of recreational waters. Six samples were either noted
as TNTC or counted at 354 and 342. Salinity values were low
when tide was low at this site suggesting that fresh water
influences are significant at this site. Furthermore, dissolved
oxygen levels were lowest at this site providing further evidence
that this site requires additional investigation.
CONCLUSION:
It appears that as one moves from the mouth of the Gulf
River to its upper reaches fecal coliform counts tend move
from below the acceptable standard to above that standard.
(See Chart 6, "Overview of Geometric Mean of Key Sampling
Sites.") Further investigation of this trend is needed.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommendations for further testing center upon improved
consistency in data collection. To meet this goal, new field
data sheets have been created for use during each field sampling
event. These new data sheets will allow for better notation
of weather conditions, wildlife observations, time, water
temperature, salinity, and GPS notations. This will make the
data tables more useful for interpretation of the data. Better
consistency in these areas would produce more accurate analysis.
In addition, as recommended by Dr. Oscar Pancorbo of the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, enterococci
testing will replace fecal coliform testing. New methodologies
will ensure greater quality control and produce more "actionable"
data.
WORKS CITED:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Standard
Operating Procedure for SM9222D, Division of Environmental
Analysis, Senator William X. Wall Experiment Station 37 Shattuck
Street Lawrence, MA 01843.
Mitchell, Mark K., Stapp, William B., Eleventh Edition
Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring An Environmental
Education Program for Schools, Dubuque, Iowa 1997, Kendall/Hunt
Publishing Company.
|